IT Compliance for BC Professional Services: PIPEDA, Law Society, and Beyond

If you run a professional services firm in British Columbia, you’re navigating a complex web of compliance requirements. Client data privacy under PIPEDA. Professional regulatory obligations from the Law Society, MFDA, or IIROC. Industry-specific standards for records retention, security, and client communication.

Most firm owners and managing partners understand they have compliance responsibilities. What’s less clear is how those abstract obligations translate to specific IT decisions: What systems are you allowed to use? Where can client data be stored? What security controls are required versus optional?

Having worked with professional services firms across BC on IT compliance for years—and having seen both successful implementations and expensive compliance failures—I want to demystify the compliance landscape and provide practical guidance you can actually use.

This isn’t a comprehensive legal analysis. For that, consult legal counsel specializing in privacy law. Instead, this is a practical overview of the IT compliance requirements facing BC professional services firms and how to meet them without transforming into a compliance specialist.

The Foundation: PIPEDA

The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) establishes baseline privacy requirements for private-sector organizations in Canada handling personal information.

For professional services firms, PIPEDA is unavoidable. You collect, use, store, and share personal information about clients as a core part of business operations. Law firms handle privileged communications and sensitive legal matters. Financial advisors manage investment portfolios and personal financial data. Architecture firms store project details tied to property owners and corporate clients.

What PIPEDA Requires for IT Systems

PIPEDA’s Principle 7 requires “safeguards appropriate to the sensitivity of the information” to protect personal information against loss, theft, unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use, or modification.

What does “appropriate safeguards” mean in practice?

The Privacy Commissioner evaluates this based on:

Sensitivity of information: Client financial records, legal files, and health information (for firms handling personal injury or estate matters) require stronger protection than general contact details.

Industry standards: What security controls are other firms in your sector implementing? Falling below industry norms creates liability.

Reasonable person test: Would a reasonable person consider your security measures adequate given the risks?

Courts and the Privacy Commissioner have increasingly held that “reasonable safeguards” include:

• Access controls: Not everyone in your firm should access all client files. Role-based access and need-to-know principles apply.

• Encryption: Data transmitted over networks (email, file sharing, remote access) should be encrypted. Data stored on portable devices (laptops, USB drives) should be encrypted.

• Authentication: Passwords alone are increasingly considered insufficient. Multi-factor authentication for systems containing personal information is becoming the expected standard.

• Security monitoring: You need to detect unauthorized access attempts or unusual activity. Basic logging and review of access to sensitive systems.

• Vendor due diligence: When using third-party cloud services or software vendors, you remain responsible for ensuring they protect client data appropriately. Contracts should address data security and privacy obligations.

A critical point: PIPEDA doesn’t require perfect security. It requires reasonable security proportionate to the risks. A two-lawyer practice doesn’t need the same security infrastructure as a 100-lawyer firm. But both need to demonstrate thoughtful security implementation appropriate to their context.

PIPEDA Breach Notification

Since 2018, PIPEDA requires organizations to:

Report breaches to the Privacy Commissioner if they involve real risk of significant harm to individuals.

Notify affected individuals when a breach creates real risk of significant harm.

Keep breach records for all incidents, whether or not they meet reporting thresholds.

“Real risk of significant harm” is evaluated based on sensitivity of information and probability of misuse. Exposed client financial records or privileged legal communications almost always meet this threshold.

Here’s where IT systems matter: you can’t report what you can’t detect. PIPEDA implicitly requires monitoring and logging capability to identify when breaches occur.

A Vancouver financial services firm discovered unauthorized access to client accounts but couldn’t determine the scope because their systems lacked adequate logging. They had to notify all clients of potential exposure rather than just affected individuals, creating significant reputational damage and client trust issues beyond the privacy violation itself.

Cross-Border Data Considerations

PIPEDA doesn’t prohibit storing personal information outside Canada. But it requires:

Comparable protection: Data transferred to other jurisdictions must receive protection comparable to PIPEDA standards.

Ongoing responsibility: You remain accountable for protecting personal information even when it’s processed by foreign service providers or stored in foreign datacenters.

Disclosure in privacy policies: Organizations should disclose when personal information is transferred outside Canada and identify the countries involved.

For professional services firms, this creates practical constraints:

US-based cloud services are permissible if you conduct due diligence and can demonstrate comparable protection. But recognize that US surveillance laws (Patriot Act, CLOUD Act) may enable US government access to data stored by US companies even if servers are in Canada.

Some professional regulatory bodies impose stricter requirements than PIPEDA on data location. We’ll address those in the sector-specific sections below.

Law Society of British Columbia Requirements

If you practice law in BC, the Law Society’s technology requirements sit on top of PIPEDA obligations.

Code of Professional Conduct Technology Provisions

The BC Code of Professional Conduct addresses technology in several places:

Rule 3.5-1 (Confidentiality) requires lawyers to “hold in strict confidence all information concerning the business and affairs of a client acquired in the course of the professional relationship.”

This duty extends to protecting information stored in electronic systems. The rule doesn’t specify particular technologies, but the Law Society has clarified that lawyers must:

• Understand the security capabilities and limitations of technologies they use
• Take reasonable steps to prevent unauthorized access to client information
• Assess whether cloud service providers offer adequate security and confidentiality protections
• Consider whether data encryption is necessary based on sensitivity of information

Rule 3.5-2 (Disclosure) creates specific exceptions for when lawyers can disclose confidential information. Importantly, unauthorized disclosure due to security failures doesn’t fall under these exceptions—lawyers remain professionally liable for breaches resulting from inadequate security.

Practical Law Society Compliance Requirements

Based on Law Society guidance, practice audits, and published discipline decisions, here’s what BC lawyers need for IT compliance:

1. Written information security policies. Document how your firm protects client confidentiality in electronic systems. This doesn’t need to be complex—a 5-10 page policy covering access controls, acceptable use, data handling, and incident response is sufficient for smaller firms.

2. Secure email practices. Email containing highly sensitive client information (settlement negotiations, privileged legal opinions, personal information) should be encrypted or sent through secure portals. At minimum, lawyers should assess email content before sending and use encryption for sensitive communications.

3. Cloud service agreements. If you use cloud practice management (Clio, PCLaw Cloud, etc.), document management (NetDocuments, iManage), or cloud storage (SharePoint, Dropbox), you should:

• Review provider security practices and data location
• Ensure contractual terms address confidentiality obligations
• Verify provider security certifications and audit reports

4. Device security. Laptops, tablets, and phones containing client information need:

• Full-disk encryption
• Strong passwords or biometric authentication
• Remote wipe capability if devices are lost or stolen
• Current security updates

5. Departure protocols. When lawyers or staff leave, you need processes for:

• Recovering firm devices
• Disabling system access
• Transferring client files appropriately
• Ensuring former employees can’t access client information

The Solicitor-Client Privilege Dimension

For lawyers, technology compliance intersects with solicitor-client privilege.

Privilege protects confidential communications between lawyer and client for purposes of legal advice. If privileged communications are disclosed to third parties, privilege may be waived—potentially devastating in litigation.

Technology creates privilege risks:

Cloud storage with US providers: If your cloud provider is subject to US legal process, could opposing counsel or government agencies compel access to privileged communications? This question lacks definitive legal answers, but risk-averse firms choose Canadian-only cloud infrastructure for litigation files and sensitive matters.

Insufficient access controls: If privileged communications are accessible to non-lawyers (administrative staff, IT contractors), does that waive privilege? Generally no if access is necessary for firm operations, but you should restrict access to what’s needed.

Inadequate security: If attackers steal privileged communications due to security failures, is privilege waived? Courts generally hold that inadvertent disclosure doesn’t waive privilege if reasonable precautions were taken. But you need to demonstrate those reasonable precautions.

A Vancouver litigation firm faced privilege challenges when privileged emails were accessed by opposing counsel after a departing associate forwarded client files to a personal email account. The court found privilege wasn’t waived but criticized the firm’s lack of technical controls preventing mass file exports.

Financial Services Compliance: MFDA and IIROC

Financial advisors in BC face compliance requirements from provincial securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations (MFDA for mutual fund dealers, IIROC for investment dealers).

MFDA Rules for Technology

The Mutual Fund Dealers Association imposes specific IT requirements:

MFDA Policy No. 2 (Cybersecurity Best Practices) requires members to:

• Implement “reasonable cybersecurity measures” to protect client information
• Maintain incident response plans for cybersecurity events
• Report cybersecurity incidents to MFDA
• Conduct employee cybersecurity training

More specifically, MFDA expects:

Multi-factor authentication for remote access to systems containing client information.

Encryption of client data on portable devices and during transmission.

Vendor due diligence when using third-party cloud services, particularly for client data storage or portfolio management systems.

Business continuity planning addressing technology failures and cybersecurity incidents.

Ongoing monitoring of unauthorized access attempts or unusual system activity.

IIROC Technology Requirements

Investment dealers regulated by IIROC face similar requirements under IIROC Rule 11.9 (Cybersecurity):

• Written cybersecurity policies and procedures
• Regular cybersecurity risk assessments
• Security awareness training for employees
• Incident response and business continuity planning
• Vendor risk management

IIROC also requires specific operational controls:

Separation of duties: Administrative access to systems shouldn’t be available to all employees.

Audit trails: Logging of access to client accounts and securities systems.

Change management: Documented processes for system changes to prevent unauthorized modifications.

Third-party access controls: Vendors or contractors accessing firm systems need specific authorization and monitoring.

Wire Fraud and Email Compromise

Financial services firms face particular risk from business email compromise and wire fraud schemes.

Attackers compromise advisor email accounts, monitor communications, and send fraudulent wire transfer instructions that appear to come from legitimate addresses. The industry has seen hundreds of these attacks resulting in millions in losses.

Both MFDA and IIROC expect firms to implement controls preventing these attacks:

• Multi-factor authentication on email accounts
• Email security filtering (anti-phishing, malware protection)
• Dual authorization for wire transfers
• Callback verification for transfer instructions received via email
• Staff training on identifying fraudulent communications

A Burnaby investment advisor firm lost $185,000 when attackers compromised an advisor’s email account and sent fraudulent transfer instructions to a client. MFDA found the firm failed to implement reasonable cybersecurity controls (no MFA on email, no dual authorization for transfers) and imposed sanctions beyond the direct financial loss.

Architecture and Engineering Firms

Architecture and engineering firms face lighter regulatory compliance compared to legal or financial services—but still have significant obligations:

PIPEDA Compliance

Standard PIPEDA requirements apply. Architecture firms handle:

• Property owner personal information
• Corporate client business information
• Employee data
• Subconsultant and contractor information

Security safeguards should protect this information following PIPEDA Principle 7.

Contractual Requirements

Many architecture firm compliance obligations arise from client contracts rather than regulation:

Government projects often require:

• Canadian-only data storage
• Specific security controls (encryption, access logging, etc.)
• Background checks for staff accessing project files
• Compliance with government IT security standards

Infrastructure projects may require:

• Heightened security for sensitive facility information
• Restricted access to design files (security concerns)
• Intellectual property protections

Corporate clients increasingly include cybersecurity requirements in professional services agreements, particularly for large projects.

Professional Practice Standards

Engineers and Geoscientists BC (EGBC) addresses technology through general professional responsibility requirements rather than specific IT rules:

• Members must protect confidential client information
• Professional work products require appropriate safeguards
• Reasonable care in selecting technology tools and service providers

CAD and BIM File Security

Architecture and engineering firms face unique technical challenges:

Large file management: Project files for complex buildings can be 10-50 GB or larger. Cloud storage and transfer of these files requires careful planning.

Collaborative workflows: Multiple firms working on project files simultaneously creates security complexity. Who has access? How are changes tracked? How is final design protected?

Long-term retention: Some projects require 10+ years of file retention for warranty and liability purposes.

A Vancouver architecture firm working on government infrastructure faced compliance review because project files were stored in US-based cloud storage violating contract requirements for Canadian data residency. The issue wasn’t the cloud storage itself—it was failure to verify data location before implementation.

Building Compliant IT Infrastructure

Across all these regulatory frameworks, certain core IT practices appear repeatedly:

Universal Compliance Requirements

1. Access controls and authentication:

• Role-based access (not everyone sees everything)
• Strong authentication (multi-factor for remote access)
• Regular access reviews

2. Encryption:

• Data in transit (VPN, SSL/TLS for email and web)
• Data at rest on portable devices
• Consideration for cloud storage encryption

3. Security monitoring:

• Logging access to sensitive systems
• Reviewing logs for unusual activity
• Intrusion detection on networks

4. Vendor management:

• Due diligence for cloud service providers
• Contractual protections for data security
• Regular vendor security reviews

5. Incident response:

• Written plans for responding to breaches
• Breach notification procedures (PIPEDA, regulatory bodies, clients)
• Business continuity planning

6. Training and policies:

• Written security policies
• Regular staff security training
• Clear acceptable use guidelines

7. Records and documentation:

• Documenting security decisions and risk assessments
• Maintaining audit trails for compliance reviews
• Breach records as required by PIPEDA

The Practical Implementation Path

For most professional services firms, compliance-focused IT infrastructure looks like:

Email: Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace with multi-factor authentication enabled, advanced threat protection, and data loss prevention policies.

File storage: Cloud-based document management (NetDocuments for legal, SharePoint for general use) with Canadian datacenter selection, access controls, and encryption.

Backup: Automated daily backups with encryption and offsite storage (air-gapped or immutable copies for ransomware protection).

Network security: Business-grade firewall, network segmentation separating guest/staff/server networks, intrusion detection.

Endpoint protection: Enterprise endpoint detection and response (EDR) software on all devices, centrally managed.

Remote access: VPN with multi-factor authentication for accessing internal systems remotely.

Security monitoring: Managed security services providing 24/7 monitoring, log analysis, and threat response.

Policies and training: Written security policies, quarterly security awareness training, annual compliance reviews.

This isn’t exotic or unaffordable. For a 15-person firm, the infrastructure costs $1,500-$2,500 monthly including managed services.

The bigger challenge is organizational commitment to actually implementing controls rather than just purchasing tools.

Common Compliance Failures

Based on professional discipline cases, Privacy Commissioner findings, and regulatory audits, here are the most common IT compliance failures:

1. “We didn’t know that was required.”

Compliance obligations exist whether you know about them or not. Claiming ignorance after a breach doesn’t eliminate liability.

Mitigation: Annual compliance review with legal counsel or IT compliance specialist. Understand your specific obligations based on profession and client types.

2. “We thought we had that.”

Believing you have security controls without verifying implementation. “We have backups” (that were never tested). “We have encryption” (but it wasn’t actually enabled).

Mitigation: Regular IT audits verifying that controls are actually active and functioning as intended.

3. “The vendor said it was secure.”

Relying on vendor assurances without conducting due diligence or reviewing security documentation.

Mitigation: Request SOC 2 reports, security certifications, and contractual security commitments. Verify data location and access controls.

4. “We’ll deal with it later.”

Deferring security improvements until after a breach forces action.

Mitigation: Treat compliance as ongoing operational requirement, not one-time project. Budget for IT security annually.

5. “That only applies to big firms.”

Assuming compliance requirements don’t apply to small practices.

Mitigation: PIPEDA, Law Society rules, and MFDA/IIROC requirements apply regardless of firm size. Smaller firms need appropriate-to-size controls, not an exemption.

Your Compliance Roadmap

Here’s a practical 90-day compliance improvement path:

Days 1-30: Assessment

• Review your current IT systems and security controls
• Identify which regulatory requirements apply to your firm
• Document gaps between current state and compliance requirements
• Prioritize based on risk and regulatory importance

Days 31-60: Quick Wins

• Enable multi-factor authentication on email and critical systems
• Verify backup restoration capability
• Implement basic security training for staff
• Review and update vendor contracts for data security terms

Days 61-90: Strategic Implementation

• Deploy endpoint protection and monitoring
• Implement network segmentation
• Create written security policies
• Establish quarterly compliance review schedule

At 90 days, you’ll have addressed the highest-risk gaps and established ongoing compliance infrastructure.

The Bottom Line

IT compliance for BC professional services firms is complex but manageable.

You don’t need to become a technology expert. You need to:

• Understand which regulations apply to your practice
• Implement appropriate security controls for the data you handle
• Work with qualified IT professionals who understand compliance requirements
• Document your security decisions and risk assessments
• Regularly review and update controls as technology and threats evolve

The cost of compliance is far lower than the cost of breaches, regulatory sanctions, and professional liability claims.

More importantly, proper IT security and compliance protects the client relationships and professional reputation that your practice is built on.

Need help navigating IT compliance for your firm? Book a consultation to review your specific regulatory obligations and develop a practical compliance roadmap.

We work with BC law firms, financial advisors, and architecture practices on compliance-focused IT infrastructure that meets regulatory requirements without creating operational complexity.

---

Will Ripley is CEO at Autimo Core. He previously led enterprise infrastructure at Amazon Canada and Best Buy Canada, and now helps BC professional services firms implement compliance-focused IT systems for PIPEDA, Law Society, MFDA, and IIROC requirements.